Next to God, America of Course was very confusing but
intriguing to read. I had to go back and re-read it a few times before I could
get a clear message that I thought seemed plausible. The first time I read I
noticed that there were bits and pieces of American anthems ,if you will, that
we honor in the United States. Because of the poem’s sarcastic tone I came to
the conclusion that the speaker is mocking our anthems and the fact that we pay
so much respect to them but really they romanticize war. When you think about
our national anthem and every other patriotic poem or song we learn to respect,
war sounds almost like something you’d want to see. For example in the “Star
Spangled Banner” we hear about “the dawn’s early light” and “the rocket’s red
glare” and so on. However there is no mention of blood or corpses or anything
remotely like what one may experience on the battlefield. It seems to me that
E.E Cummings is trying to bring up the idea that these idealized war anthems
made people eager to step onto the battlefield for this sort of wonderful
experience but they ended up dying, losing limbs, and being mentally,
emotionally, and physically scarred. I also thought it was interesting that the
title poked at the fact that the United States asserts itself as the world’s
greatest power and the only thing that could be more powerful than America is
God. The sarcastic tone of the title also hints at the sarcasm in the poem,
like we all know that America is second to God and we should roll our eyes
while reading (until of course the last few lines where the speaker’s
intentions became obvious to me).
I see what you're saying with this. I took away from this a piece how the anthem forms a sort of homogenous view of what it means to be American. It brings up images of battle and god and puts it together so close that it seems to mean one thing. The intentional bad spelling and dialect also added to the sarcasm of the piece.
ReplyDelete"next to of course god america i" is the full title--playful, as you both note, and also sarcastic, as vitterac (who are you?:)) notes. I also wanted to point you to the punctuation of this poem. This is a speech somebody gives, right? And the last line is very important to that reading. Who might this speaker be? and why the sarcasm? What is e.e. cummings doing in this poem (especially in light of the readings for tomorrow)? great work so far! keep the comments coming!
ReplyDelete